Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 19,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2011, 7:33 am
Bobby has the scoop on the first case, Al-Jedda v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm
What will fit less comfortably are modern human rights treaties, which purport to regulate how the United States (including its state and local governments) interacts with its own citizens. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:38 pm
On 29 May 2012, the European Court of Human Rights handed down the judgment in the case Bjedov v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:36 pm
Supreme Court decision in Mcgirt v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
Facts: This case (GOMEZ et al v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:01 am
Specifically, Article 24 only applies if a state is using a power covered by Chapter IV (Procedural Measures and Law Enforcement) when responding to a request under Chapter V (International Cooperation). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
The Judgment of the South African Constitutional Court in Mazibuko v City of Johnnesburg [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:35 am
Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57; [2008] WLR (D) 291 “The definition of ‘protected site’ in s 5(1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983, in excluding gipsies from the protection of the Act, was incompatible with an occupier's right under art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to respect for his home. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:03 am
Ali and another v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] WLR (D) 86 “A local housing authority’s duty, under section 193 of the Housing Act 1996, to secure that accommodation be made available for an unintentionally homeless person who had a priority need did not give the homeless person a ‘civil right’ within the meaning of art 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
Mollie V. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 5:29 pm
In stark comparison, in Hines v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:59 am
Does 'Too Hot' Woman Have an EEOC Claim in an 'At Will' Employment State? [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:35 am
MT (Algeria) and others v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Queens College of the City University of New York not subject to the City's Human Right Law because it is a State entityJattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentLincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law §… [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:20 am
., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
August 2, 2019 Double Jeopardy, State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 12:10 am
Yesterday in Case of Hasan & Eylem Zengin v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:42 am
Yousuf, on behalf of major human rights organizations, and Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, and United States v. [read post]
