Search for: "IDE v STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
Kisor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:59 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States decided United States v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Department of Justice and the whistleblowers’ bar.[1] In its U.S. ex rel. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
Oregon Department of Justice, 254 Ore. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:59 pm
Department of Justice goes against this broad judicial consensus. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:20 am
Bar's ethics complaint against former Trump Administration Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
In American Center for Law and Justice v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:00 pm
Department of Justice) Ian Lopez: Apple Loses PTAB Bid to Kill Claims in Universal ID Patent (1) (Source: Bloomberg Law) Christopher Rowland: Trump Administration Sues Drugmaker Gilead Sciences Over Patent on Truvada for HIV Prevention (Source: The Washington Post) Chris Bruce: Ferrari Patents More Efficient V12 Engine (Source: Motor 1) Source: USPTO Commentary and Journal Articles: Prof. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 4:54 am
United States Department of Justice, 2007 U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
The Department of Water Resources (DWR) is the agency defending the action for the state, represented by the Attorney General. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
"
Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:01 pm
In Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:47 pm
See id. at 52,201. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:45 am
" Id. at 75. . . . [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
See id. at 694. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:41 am
" Id.; see also City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]