Search for: "IN RE: RULES FOR DISTRICT COURTS OF OKLAHOMA"
Results 241 - 260
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2019, 10:18 am
It was therefore not surprising -- but wholly arbitrary -- when the panel reversed the district court's ruling in 1996.To mitigate such arbitrariness is another important safeguard -- en banc review, in which an 11-judge Ninth Circuit panel has the option to review a 3-judge panel's ruling. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 11:10 am
It was therefore not surprising -- but wholly arbitrary -- when the panel reversed the district court's ruling in 1996.To mitigate such arbitrariness is another important safeguard -- en banc review, in which an 11-judge Ninth Circuit panel has the option to review a 3-judge panel's ruling. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 10:18 am
It was therefore not surprising -- but wholly arbitrary -- when the panel reversed the district court's ruling in 1996.To mitigate such arbitrariness is another important safeguard -- en banc review, in which an 11-judge Ninth Circuit panel has the option to review a 3-judge panel's ruling. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:18 am
Oklahoma – Democratic Party Sues Oklahoma Ethics CommissionThe Oklahoman – Rick Green | Published: 8/11/2015 Oklahoma Democratic Party is suing the state Ethics Commission over new agency rules that prohibit any fundraising or distribution of election materials on state-owned property. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am
§ 10-604(b).[3] As stated by the District Court of Maryland, the conduct proscribed by the current statute was first made a statutory offense in Maryland in 1908. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Along those lines, although the court’s ruling meant that any decisions in which the three commissioners participated while they were recess appointees would be invalid, nothing in the ruling suggested that it would invalidate other, earlier recess appointments. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
They’re f***ing idiots. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
In re Askin, 47 F.3d 100 (U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
The FTCA gives federal district courts exclusive jurisdiction over tort suits against federal employees acting within the scope of their employment. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm
The UCCJEA provides the rules by which the courts around the nation can determine which state, district, territory, or nation, should exercise jurisdiction in child custody proceedings. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Aileen Cannon’s decision problematic because it upends the usual course of a criminal investigation and suggests there are different rules for a former president. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973). [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 6:51 pm
Whether the trial court erred in ruling appellant’s hearsay statement to co-defendant Scott Wholaver was inadmissible under the present sense impression or excited utterance exceptions to the hearsay rule; 11. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 7:28 am
Supreme Court ruling. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
The district court rejected the motion. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm
Instead of ruling on the merits of the petitioner’s claims, the court would rule on the merits to decide if there was merit. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Hamilton, 372 S.W.3d 140, 157, 159 (Tex. 2012) (citing §6; also citing comment b).We also note that a Texas appellate court has emphatically rejected an analogous argument that the learned intermediary rule shouldn’t apply to medical devices. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:49 am
District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma 2009). [read post]
