Search for: "IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF THOMAS" Results 241 - 260 of 459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
In these cases, Thomas spends little time talking about his usual focus, original public meaning. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Its opinions about Obamacare, the Voting Rights Act and the Defense of Marriage Act are self-conscious landmarks in our constitutional history. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
 We all know Justice Thomas’ answer – but he is an extremist on the issue. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-19, 2014).Helen M. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
Bergeris, supra (quoting Cynthia Callahan & Thomas C. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:17 am
Thomas avers that this policy has a detrimental effect on the status of his marriages, because his wives are threatening to divorce him under Islamic religious rules if they are unable to have intercourse with him. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:28 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Actively questioning both sides, the Justices of the Illinois Supreme Court seemed conflicted during the recent oral argument in In re Marriage of Turk. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel A. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Hopkins, by Martha ChamallasSix Cases in Search of a Decision: The Story of In re Marriage Cases, by Patricia A. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
’s Theology Study Thomas O’Connor and his coauthors compared recidivism between 54 inmates who participated in a master’s program in theology at Sing Sing prison and 402 non-participants. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Thomas asked whether the cause should be remanded for the court to consider allocation of the psychologist's fees pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 604(b) of the Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 11:44 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Thomas asked whether it was time for In re Marriage of Verdung, heavily relied on by defendant, to be reexamined in light of subsequent amendments to Section 2-301 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 1505 of the Mortgage Foreclosure Law? [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 6:12 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Legal Times] * You’re doin’ fine, Oklahoma! [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]