Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. P., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 241 - 260 of 556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2009, 1:42 pm
Prosecuting domestic violence crimes is a legitimate government interest and § 1109 furthers that interest. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:21 am
The primary issue of concern - TM's contact with Mother and Child - was exactly the opposite of what the trial testimony said it would be. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:34 am by WSLL
S-11-0130, Father appealed the district court’s order denying his petition to modify the parties’ divorce decree, which granted mother primary physical custody of their minor child, and to grant him primary physical custody of their child. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:09 am by Kate Fort
These are not reasons to deny a tribe jurisdiction over a child welfare case: The State argued that transfer should be denied because of the lack ofresponsibility by Mother and Father, the efforts of the foster parents to promotethe children’s Native American heritage, and the good relationship between thecurrent professionals and the children. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm by Ryan H. Cassman
Yes, but only “if the court finds that an award of joint legal custody would be in the best interest of the child. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am by Patricia Hughes
According to a report on the site Life Site, the plaintiffs include a nurse whose three unvaccinated “healthy” children will not be able to attend school; an educational assistant with two children “whose mother chose not to have her brother and sister vaccinated after her children had several adverse reactions to vaccines”; a mother with five children, two of whom “’suffered severe reactions and injuries from vaccines resulting in her refusal to… [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by INFORRM
Background The claimant was the father of Peter Connelly, known as “Baby P”, who was separated from the baby’s mother. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:21 am by <ADMINNICENAME>
(c)(1) There is a rebuttable presumption that a custodian’s decision denying or limiting visitation to the petitioner is in the best interest of the child. (2) To rebut the presumption, the petitioner must prove by a preponderance of the evidence the following: (A) The petitioner has established a significant and viable relationship with the child for whom he or she is requesting visitation; and (B) Visitation with the petitioner is in the best… [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:04 am
Roberts, 345 P.3d 1226, 2015 UT 24 (Supreme Court of Utah 2015). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
“Today, the scarce resource is attention, not programming,” notes Ellen P. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
A mother may share her child's genes and yet not have given birth to her (surrogacy). [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 7:30 am
Once the doctor clears her to work, it is out of the employer's hands to say otherwise, even if it has the mother's and baby's best interests at heart. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 8:11 am
(Guardianship of Ann S., supra, 45 Cal.4th at p. 1132.) [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The headline ‘All I did was tell the truth…then court threw me in jail’ This is a quote from Victoria Haigh, the mother of a child who the family court sent to live with her father after it concluded that the mothers allegations against the father were untrue and the child was emotionally unsafe in her care. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Cari Rincker
The trial court held that the embryos were to be donated to a third party because it could not compel the husband to procreate, and the husband’s interest in not wanting to procreate trumped the wife’s interest to become a mother of a biological child. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:38 pm
&nbsp; The first statement made by the child &ndash; &ldquo;Daddy beat me&rdquo; &ndash; was made to the child&rsquo;s mother. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
s biological ancestry was Indian, but stated that,From the unique facts of this case, where the child was abandoned to the adoptive mother essentially at the earliest practical moment after childbirth and initial hospital care, we cannot discern how the subsequent adoption proceedings constituted a “breakup of the Indian family. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Gregory Forman
The family court found clear and convincing evidence showed Mother failed to remedy the conditions causing removal, Child had been in foster care for fifteen of the most previous twenty-two months, and TPR was in Childs best interest. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:17 am by Karsner &#38; Meehan, P.C.
The estate pointed to the missing original, contemporaneous paper tracings, arguing that the copies in evidence did not have any handwritten notations of the defendants, so it was difficult to tell whether the doctors noted a reassuring or non-reassuring heart rate during the mothers labor. [read post]