Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF G. G., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 241 - 260 of 419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Ultimately, the Family Court must balance that risk against the harm removal might bring, and it must determine factually which course is in the child’s best interests. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Ultimately, the Family Court must balance that risk against the harm removal might bring, and it must determine factually which course is in the child’s best interests. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 8:08 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
(k) Mother’s Day shall be spent with the natural or adoptive mother every year beginning at 9 a.m. until 7 p.m. on the holiday. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm by Mark Ashton
Mother asserted that this was a prior restraint of the child’s rights under the 1st Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:30 am by Senior Editor
The defendant’s attorneys offered a structured settlement, costing $1,267,000 that would have, over the lifetime of the child, paid out well over $100 million dollars. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
In the Matter of S (a child), heard 20 February 2012. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:25 am by Diana L. Skaggs
 The FC decided Pennington applied and that the best interests of the child standard applied to motions for relocation. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Law Lady
Appellees. 3rd District.Paternity -- Disestablishment -- Trial court erred in granting petition to disestablish paternity on ground that mother failed to produce child for DNA testing without determining whether mother's failure to submit child for testing was willfulDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o M.J.W., Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Interest groups spent a record $1.8 billion on state lobbying in 2021. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:08 am by alexkorotkin
 The mother’s behavior included the following: “Plaintiff intentionally scheduled their child’s (N. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:47 am by Aurora Barnes
Smith  16-992 Issue: Whether a state violates the 14th Amendment by denying married same-sex couples the same right afforded to married opposite-sex couples under state law to have the name of the birth mother’s spouse entered as the second parent on their child’s birth certificate. [read post]