Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 241 - 260 of 8,689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
And this is why Westbrook's assertion that Keisel's comment was "racial" can't be proven to be true or false. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:07 pm by thomasgalvani
  A cancellation doesn’t put a trademark owner on its heels the way an opposition does. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:06 am by Tian Lu
Such works, due to their uniqueness in expression, lack originality.As for the use of AI to generate images, the matter of whether or not it reflects the personalised expression of the author should not be generalized, but needs to be judged on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
This isn't a uniform view, and the Supreme Court hasn't endorsed (or rejected) it, but it's the majority view (see Anti-Libel Injunctions). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
It is well established that "[w]hen a statement is substantially true, a minor inaccuracy will not support a defamation claim. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
This update includes the following: CFM Items Q4 Matters Annual Compliance & Other Items Annual Fund Matters Annual Management Company Matters Notable Regulatory & Other Items from 2023 Compliance Calendar **** CFM Items We are pleased to welcome Jon Tong as a Senior Associate in our Funds practice group. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
There really should be a fee shift when a competitor harasses another competitor for daring to make comparisons of part numbers, but we don't seem to live in that world. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:59 am by Asha Rangappa
The pressure to fabricate intelligence is not new: We saw the ramifications of politicized intelligence under the George W. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Guest Author
  In its brief at the Supreme Court, the government’s primary submission is that it doesn’t matter, because the Sixteenth Amendment doesn’t require “realization” at all. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court also concluded that plaintiff didn't adequately allege "actual malice," i.e., knowing or reckless falsehood. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Memorandum indicated that "[w]hile spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:36 am
Brenda Joan Hollifield, Opposition No. 91247611 and Cancellation No. 92072531 (November 30, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
From a decision released Oct. 24, but just posted on Westlaw, ISCR Case No. 22-00849 (Dep't of Defense Office of Hearings & Appeals) (Administrative Judge Edward W. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:32 am by Amy Howe
The post Justices won’t hear “conversion therapy” case appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]