Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 1:36 pm
The SCC also clearly stated in the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:01 am
The commission may renew such a license only if it is demonstrated that the person's continued presence in the United States is authorized under federal law. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:06 pm
There are more than 213 million registered voters in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996); and State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
” Criminal Law: “In-Dock” Identification EvidenceR. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:55 am
In other words, the impeachment process doesn’t serve as a crime-laundering device. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
But not everyone saw the effects of this new technology as benign: some saw the prophesied erosion of state power as an invitation to anarchy, or as opening the door to the very evils that the state power was being deployed to prevent. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
The description of the collateral must “make possible the identification of the collateral described. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
Supp. 2d 348 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); Bryant v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
This is hardly bulk collection in the sense that worries Glenn Greewald and others, but would seem to be precluded by a law that restricts collection to the identification of individual accounts or people. [read post]
