Search for: "In Interest of AC"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2013, 10:00 am
It will be interesting to see if AC attempts to use this survey at the Copyright Board or in its litigation against York University, concerning which York has yet to respond publicly.HPKPS - the above was written before I looked at and responded to the survey in my capacity as an AC creator affiliate. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm
That defence, the full title of which is ‘publication on matter of public interest’, was introduced with Section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 to replace the common defence of “responsible journalism” – dubbed the ‘Reynolds’ defence after the seminal House of Lords decision in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Texas, and is a former chair of the ACS Board. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:20 am
Professor Robson is also the ACS faculty advisor for the CUNY School of Law Student Chapter. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:19 pm
by Jeremy Leaming The lawsuits lodged against the Affordable Care Act’s contraception coverage policy are resting on wobbly legal ground, says a Brigham Young University law school professor in a new ACS Issue Brief. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
She is the author of the 2010 ACS Issue Brief, “The Prop 8 Court Can Have it All: Justice, Precedent, Respect for Democracy, and an Appropriately Limited Judicial Role. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:06 pm
(Will Baude) IU Law Professor Steve Sanders has a post on the ACS Blog discussing Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 10:27 pm
• Also rather interesting is AUCC’s non-reply to Prof. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:34 am
Alas, he won’t be covering my panel (Orin’s is more interesting I suppose), so I may have to live blog that myself. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm
They point out that in Bonnick v Morris ([2003] 1 AC 300) the Privy Council took the view that the single meaning rule could not be applied without modification when a court was considering the Reynolds defence and the question of whether a journalist had acted responsibly. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 12:45 pm
The AC v York U litigation is not.Here's an update. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 2:33 pm
We rehearsed the recent history from Lloyds Bank v Rosset [1991] 1 AC 107 through Oxley v Hiscock. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
This rationale is referred to as the ‘Bonnick Principle’ following the 2002 Privy Council decision in Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 12:19 am
Securing a legal job often hinges on acing the interview. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm
At times in this blog, I refer to Access Copyright as “AC”. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 11:01 am
As it is of rather academic interest, I have kept it for the weekend. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:33 pm
If the Copyright Board does not provide a remedy rather quickly, the Competition Act may prove to be an interesting and fertile potential resource since this “interim” tariff could last for several years, given the usual rate of proceedings at the Board and likely subsequent judicial review. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 1:03 pm
Could make for an interesting lawsuit. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:29 am
In addition to the legal reforms required to separate powers, Merpel is interested to see that CIPA is also proposing fiscal changes, to give the Boards their own budget and financial independence.Text of the letter starts here:6th February 2015 Dear Mr. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:34 am
The Board in T 1063/18 (Pepper) found that the AC Rule amendment was void. [read post]
