Search for: "In Interest of Ac" Results 241 - 260 of 2,338
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2021, 7:41 am by Mary Brooks, Paul Rosenzweig
They’re designed by commercial companies, public interest groups, intelligence agencies and private investors. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:35 am by Alex Vivona
The strategy behind ACE moves Air Force personnel away from main operating bases and disperses them within the Pacific region. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Listeria Listeria (pronounced liss-STEER-ē-uh) is a gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium that can grow under either anaerobic (without oxygen) or aerobic (with oxygen) conditions. [4, 18] Of the six species of Listeria, only L. monocytogenes(pronounced maw-NO-site-aw-JUH-neez) causes disease in humans. [18] These bacteria multiply best at 86-98.6 degrees F (30-37 degrees C), but also multiply better than all other bacteria at refrigerator temperatures, something that allows… [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:51 am by INFORRM
Essentially, the ruling grants editors a fairly wide margin of appreciation in deciding how best to present stories of public interest. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
So it's not exactly a patent case, but it deals with interesting questions about what an applicant or patentee can and can't do to protect their invention when novelty or inventiveness is in doubt.The issue of the validity of the UK designation of the patent in suit was held to be invalid as long ago as July 2007 by the late Pumfrey J held ([2007] EWHC 1538 (Pat)). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
So it's not exactly a patent case, but it deals with interesting questions about what an applicant or patentee can and can't do to protect their invention when novelty or inventiveness is in doubt.The issue of the validity of the UK designation of the patent in suit was held to be invalid as long ago as July 2007 by the late Pumfrey J held ([2007] EWHC 1538 (Pat)). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It is said to be undesirable because it narrowly restricts the interest protected by the tort to the claimant’s economic interest in the third party’s freedom to deal or trade with the claimant. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am by INFORRM
This Round up was complied by Suneet Sharma a junior legal professional with a particular interest and experience in media, information and privacy law. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:31 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
To remedy the situation, the society closed out the interest rate swap contracts early at a cost of over £32m. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm by Giles Peaker
We have found that Croydon granted Camelot an interest in land (see [44] above). [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
The most interesting aspects of the decision, with possible far-reaching implications, are two-fold. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
, [1987] AC 460, 478 (HL). [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 held that the damage did not need to be exactly the same – the rule should be flexible in order to do justice. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:03 pm by Patricia Hughes
Specialized clinics focus on particular groups of people or particular areas of law (such as the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly or ACE, Black Legal Action Centre, Centre for Spanish-Speaking Peoples, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario and the Canadian Environmental Law Association, among others) or provide support rather than direct services (Community Legal Education Ontario or the Income Security Advocacy Centre). [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
It was only a judgment in Markt & Co Ltd v Knight Steamship [1910] AC 426 that drastically constrained the commonality requirement to a “same interest” test and so use of the vehicle. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Thereafter, the attorney for the children (AFC) moved to vacate which denied the plaintiff’s motion contending that case law issued subsequent to the hearing on the validity of the prenuptial agreement held that he should have been permitted to participate in the hearing to represent the interests of the children. [read post]