Search for: "In Re: Lead Paint Litigation"
Results 241 - 260
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 10:42 am
" In re Lead Paint Litigation, 191 N.J. 405, 436-37 (2007). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 am
While clients may appreciate knowing what level of service they're paying for, he added that clients may also shy away from hiring the lowest performers. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
Which of these three options is going to get President Obama re-elected: (a) 500,000 new jobs, (b) expanding health care for 10 million additional Americans, or (c) Seventh Circuit Judge Diane Wood? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Vehicle Paint Litigation, 182 F.R.D. 214, 221-22 (E.D. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:21 am
Consumers can see that a toy has paint on it, for example, but not know whether the paint contains lead. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Apartment Complex Owner Pays Fine for Failing to Warn Tenants about Lead Paint in Springfield, Mass. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:18 pm
"In the B.C. case, the judge's concluding remarks will probably lead to a resolution of the entire lawsuit. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 4:07 am
Because whether state executive officers can, without legislative appropriation or approval, hire contingent fee counsel to sue drug and device (and lots of other) manufacturers is an important cutting edge issue, we're posting the briefs and describing what they say. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
See In re A.H. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 5:10 am
” Id.Download PDF file of In re Mattel, Inc., Toy Lead Paint Products Liability Litigation [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Destefano, No. 07-1428Title VII Whether municipalities may decline to certify results of an exam that would make disproportionately more white applicants eligible for promotion than minority applicants, due to fears that certifying the results would lead to charges of racial discrimination. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Destefano, No. 07-1428Title VII/Whether municipalities may decline to certify results of an exam that would make disproportionately more white applicants eligible for promotion than minority applicants, due to fears that certifying the results would lead to charges of racial discrimination.o SCOTUS docket hereo Noted here: SCOTUSblog (including filings); SCOTUSblog (summary); Connecticut Employment Law Blog; Yahoo News; Christian Science Monitor; New Haven Register; Law Memo; Business… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
" In re Lead Pigment Litigation, No. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
" In re Lead Pigment Litigation, No. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 4:04 am
Toy Lead Paint Products Liability Litigation [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
In re: Epogen & Aranesp Off-Label Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation,MDL 08-1934 PSG (AGRx), slip op. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Nov. 24, 2008)(Unpub)Rejecting employee's "pointillist painting" theory, affirms dismissal of fem's gender/HWE/retal claims [related to Vaughn decision, next] Vaughn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
We fed the blog instead.Let's take a look at the reasoning.THE PRINCIPLES OF AGGREGATE LITIGATIONENCOURAGE MORE CLASS ACTIONSSection 2.03, as a whole "paints an overly optimistic view of the viability and usefulness of the issues class device in aggregate proceedings. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP)… [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
" Buckman, 531 U.S. at 349 n.4 (for the first quote), 352 (for the second).Exclusively.In our prior post on Albertsons/Farm Raised Salmon we described §337(a) preemption as "really powerful - perhaps the most sweeping available. . .under the FDCA" and that "it essentially ousts all private litigation. [read post]
