Search for: "In Re: M., Mark, III" Results 241 - 260 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2011, 11:39 pm by Jeff Gamso
  (I'm not optimistic, but then I'm never optimistic.) [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Practitioners will find it interesting, if not useful, that the court was prepared to use trade mark cases to inform the requisite knowledge required in a DMCA case. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
  You’re not actually congratulating me, I’m afraid — you’re congratulating yourself, for holding the views you hold. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:27 pm by Nate Nead
And while PIPEs have their risks (Mark Cuban’s disdain for them was the ultimate contributor to his censure by the SEC), they’re less risky than their 100% non-public, illiquid PPM counterparts, but they’re typically only used by companies that are already lackluster and are paying more for the financing than they should (since PIPEs are usually financed at a discount). [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:50 am by Old Fox
Numerous Pythons, Anacondas, Cobras, and Diamondbacks would exceed the $5,000 mark and many surpassed the $10,000 mark. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant re-submitted the amended description dealt with in the decision under appeal as the main request and submitted two further amended descriptions as auxiliary requests 1 and 2. [read post]