Search for: "In Re: Mitchell B." Results 241 - 260 of 284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2008, 5:51 pm
You're listening to episode number 137 on Tuesday, November 18, 2008. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
(Substituted opinion) U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 13, 2008 In re: Gallaher, No. 07-74593 In a criminal appeal arising from a district court's refusal to accept a conditional guilty plea, a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the refusal is denied but the matter is remanded for reassignment to a new judge to reconsider the conditional plea where: 1) under Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Mitchell    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08b0020p.06 In re: Janice B. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Mitchell    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0301p.06 2008/08/18 Info-Hold Incorporated v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
In re Vernon Payne and Evla Payne Irrevocable Trust (Parkevich v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Patterson MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California, 90013-1024 (213) 892-5200 Mitchell M. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
Within days, the administration said they were going to re-try Dr. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mitchell, No. 06-516 Conviction for aggravated identity theft is reversed where defendant did not couple his use of the name "Marcus Jackson" a sufficient amount of correct, distinguishing information to identify a specific Marcus Jackson, as required by the statute. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
The "exhaustion doctrine . . . does not apply to an expressly conditional sale or license," B. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Newson, No. 06-41115 "A defendant is not entitled to a decrease under U.S.S.G. section 3E1.1(b) unless the Government files a motion requesting the adjustment. [read post]