Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases" Results 241 - 260 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
Few, if any, courts instruct juries on the pitfalls of eyewitness identification or caution them to be skeptical of eyewitness testimony. 2. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Capital case Christeson earned its sixth relist this week; it asks (1) whether an actual conflict of interest meets the “interests of justice” standard established in Martel v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
For that is the test of the need for a jury trial: if reasonable minds could differ over the facts, then let each side present its best case to the jury, and allow the jury to resolve the differing versions, under appropriate instructions from the court. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
In every case the proper permissions have been obtained. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  The case, In Re Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan Products Liability Litigation (US DC NJ) MDL No. 2875 (RBK)is a products liability case that concerns the sale in the U.S. of generic, prescription Valsartan pharmaceuticals, found by the Food and Drug Administration [“FDA”] to contain cancer‐causing contaminants. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:55 pm
" Watch for Nacchio's lawyers to seize on this argument when fighting over jury instructions on remand. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
   "To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am by Jack Sharman
The advocate should consult with care the state of the law applicable to his or her jurisdiction as well as any pattern instructions and instructions given in recent cases. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:29 am by John Floyd
The federal district court denied the officers’ defense, finding there was sufficient evidence to let the case be tried by a jury. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 1:58 pm by Susan Hennessey, Benjamin Wittes
Leaking FBI memos on a sensitive case, regardless of classification, violates federal laws, including the Privacy Act, standard FBI employment agreement and nondisclosure agreements that all personnel must sign. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:33 pm by Kevin
  Without getting into all the details, the third jury was given a confusing instruction on residency that included both legal standards, and it seems very likely that this was a prejudicial error. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 7:40 am by William McGrath
Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer said that "[t]his indictment reflects our commitment to holding individuals, as well as companies, accountable for violations of the FCPA," which has yielded mixed results in 2011, including a sentence of record length in one case, but a hung jury in another and the decision in the Lindsey Manufacturing case discussed above. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:33 pm by crimdefense@hotmail.com
Individuals charged with OWI can challenge the accuracy of the sobriety tests results in court by providing evidence that they were not administered in a standardized way or that environmental conditions prevented them from completing them as instructed. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
The case also may (or may not) also address the issue of whether the preponderance standard applied to the burden on the non-moving party violates the Article XV jury trial right. [read post]