Search for: "In Re Application of US for an Order"
Results 241 - 260
of 15,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm
In an Illinois divorce appellate court in Illinois reviews final orders, interlocutory (temporary) orders and custody/parenting time orders. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:21 am
The image of the design appears at the top of the computer screen during use, and it also dominates Applicant's website, because it is set off from surrounding text and other graphic material. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
Feel free to use them as you wish. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:04 am
You can avoid that hassle and use an online service – find out more information below. [read post]
18 May 2021, 3:57 am
See, e.g., In re Chem. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:38 am
[Re-posting: I'm traveling to New Orleans.] [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:49 pm
Co-blogger Will Baude recently blogged about the Supreme Court’s unusual re-argument order in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
In separate orders (142568, 142566 & (67)), the Court granted leave to appeal in In re Mays, Minors. [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:52 am
In re Chevron 3rd Cir. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
Res Judicata “Res judicata, or claims preclusion, prevents the relitigation of a claim or cause of action that has been finally adjudicated, as well as related matters that, with the use of diligence, should have been litigated in the prior suit. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 4:01 am
"Applicants are strongly encouraged to follow preferred practice in order to ensure the orderly administration of ex parte appeals. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:26 am
In re Jung No. 2010-1019 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:17 am
In re: Applicant for Security Clearance, ISCR Case No. 09-02545 (Jun. 27, 2012). [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:24 am
Contact Us Applications for restraining orders critically impact victims and their alleged perpetrators. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:24 pm
" Sunland's assertion that Registrant uses its mark in an "inconspicuous manner on its packaging" was inappropriate, since Registrant's rights in its mark cannot be restricted based on applicant's assertions as to how the mark is used, nor can the marks at issue be distinguished based on how Applicant uses its mark.Sunland oddly contended that the marks would be pronounced differently, but as the Board has proclaimed many… [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
It’s a service that saves you time and money with your European application, but this beneficial service could be in jeopardy if U.S. applicants don’t make use of it. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:41 am
The applicant filed a Statement of Use together with a "specimen" showing the mark as used in commerce. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:38 am
In re Four Seasons Hotels Ltd., 987 F.2d 1565, 26 USPQ2d 1071 (Fed. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 4:57 am
In view of the "prevalence of online retailing" and the specialized nature of Applicant's products, the Board found Applicant's home webpage to constitute a "display associated with the goods" and therefore a proper specimen of use for the mark VALPRO for tools for power operated metal cutting machines. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm
It is called Re Orphans From Syria [2019] EWHC 3202 (Fam). [read post]
