Search for: "In Re Application of Warren" Results 241 - 260 of 374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Steve Hall
Supreme Court ruled that racism in the application of the death penalty doesn’t matter, we’re finally beginning to have an honest discussion about how we justify legally killing people. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm
An 87 year old deceased rich man who was never married and had no children had invested wisely and left a non-specific estate of over $7,000,000. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:51 am by Linda Moss
And there's another possible application: monitoring astronauts during and after long space flights, according to MIT. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
”     In California, as elsewhere, when it is applicable, the business judgment rule.[8] precludes judicial second-guessing of decisions made by corporate fiduciaries in good faith or where the decision can be attributed to any rationale business purpose.[9]  The rule is procedural and process oriented. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:10 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Guardian News and Media Ltd, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2012] EWCA Civ 420 (03 April 2012) Faniyan v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWCA Civ 411 (03 April 2012) Central Bank of Nigeria v Williams [2012] EWCA Civ 415 (03 April 2012) CB & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 418 (03 April 2012) Council of the City of Sunderland v Brennan & Ors [2012]… [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:26 am
An 87 year old deceased rich man who was never married and had no children had invested wisely and left a non-specific estate of over $7,000,000. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:51 pm by Rick
McEathron told a local newspaper in October, “but if they look out the window and see this thing sitting there, they’re going to know you’re serious. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:04 pm by Jeff Foust
“If we had a healthy economy and had more Bill Gateses and more Warren Buffetts, the money would be there. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Because those cuts are an application of demand-side job growth. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:40 pm by Orin Kerr
Where that rule is applicable, officials can know that they will not be held personally liable as long as their actions are reasonable in light of current American law. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:17 am by Guest Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLPThis article provides in-house counsel with an overview of the process of selling a privately-held company in an M&A transaction and some of the significant deal points typically negotiated by the parties. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 3:07 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Long before the day comes that there are fewer applicants than available seats, we will be in very big trouble. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:59 am by Steve McConnell
Second, the defendants in Rynes had the temerity (and good sense) to argue that Bausch (and another crummy case, Warren), contravened Rule 8 and TwIqbal. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
Question:   So as you’re writing, who was the audience you had in mind? [read post]