Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 241 - 260
of 5,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
The study Horvitz & Levy cites makes another point: if you non-Californians think we're a little goofy here, just wait: your time is coming. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:37 pm
Since if we're writing probation conditions -- or anything else -- that read like that, we're in trouble.So I'm on completely board for Justice Rushing's sentiments. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:02 pm
You're telling me you should grant parole to a guy who killed and stole for $110,000, but not $110? [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:53 pm
Cal.) has issued an order granting the County of Santa Clara and City of San Francisco's motions for a preliminary injunction, preventing Section 9(a) of Trump's January 25, 2017 Immigration Executive Order... [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Cal. 2011). [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:16 pm
But maybe there's hope we're actually -- actually -- making a difference. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:46 pm
(In re Brenda M. (2008) 160 Cal.App.4th 772, 777 [“ ‘Crossexamination is the principal means by which the believability of a witness and the truth of his testimony are tested. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:03 pm
On July 20, 2011, the California Supreme Court granted review of the Second District (Division 8) opinion upholding denial of certification of meal break claims in In Re Lamps Plus Overtime Cases, 195 Cal. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 12:27 pm
Which is confusing, because the opinion hadn't yet even talked about an MSA -- much less its contents -- and normally, when you say that a party gets "less" money, you're talking about (1).So a bit confusing.On the merits, by the way, I see why the Court of Appeal ends up where it does. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 2:52 pm
If it doesn't feel like it, or doesn't feel they're significant, it can just ignore 'em. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:02 am
No opposition, everything seems fine.Now, you're thinking that since this is a published opinion, he wants to change his name to "Hitler" or "F**ker" or "Joe Biden Bite Me" or something like that. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
The Court of Appeal's call for legislative action here might well not fall on deaf ears.You're not usually going to see the Legislature fall over itself to pass a statute that favors someone who's committed a crime. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
When you're talking about a difference of a month or so (i.e., conception in maybe August 2012 versus incarceration in July 2012), and when the discharge report gives a huge range of 28 to 37 weeks for gestation, I'm not certain I'd rely on that much on a mathematical calculation to "prove" that someone who mother has identified as the father was definitely not, in fact, the father.I'd instead probably rely less on the hospital discharge report than on… [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:08 pm
And if you're not getting adopted as a baby, what are the chances that someone's going to adopt a kid with serious disabilities once he's double digits? [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 5:38 pm
All the while, we pretend that the Governor's decision is "neutral" even though we all know full well that we're really just engaging in Kabuki theatre.But whatever. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Cal., 530 U.S. 392, 120 S. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:05 pm
So you've got no right under the regulations, or under the Due Process Clause, to sleep with your spouse while you're in prison.Sorry about that. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Cal. 2012). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Cal. 2012). [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:46 pm
So a willing buyer would now be willing to pay slightly more for these benefits, as they're now more certain. [read post]
