Search for: "In Re FC"
Results 241 - 260
of 284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
In the August 2010 volume of The Colorado Lawyer, Ronald M. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
The truth or falsity of the information is an irrelevant inquiry in deciding whether the information is entitled to be protected and judges should be chary of becoming side-tracked into that irrelevant inquiry [86] The second is the authoritative decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court (In re Guardian News and Media Ltd & Others [2010] UKSC 1), in light of the (reasonably) clear and consistent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) (See eg Europapress Holding… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 10:02 am
(David Post) So we’re down to the final question: Who to root for on Sunday? [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm
Die Vertragsdauer von fünf Jahren war nicht übermässig iSv ZGB 27 II (was als ordre public-Verletzung in Frage gekommen wäre), und [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:30 am
FC: And you’re just finishing your term as president of LLSDC, which you did while you were getting your Master’s in Law Firm Management [laughs]. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:08 am
No, not under the current law, according to this Formal Opinion 10-FC-80 issued by the state Public Access Counselor::Under... [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:50 am
Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd. 2009 FC 256 — has held a disclaimer can be refused if not filed in the prescribed form and manner. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
FC does not have the authority to re-characterize a “petition” for a DVO as a motion for an extension of a DVO. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
On the Rangers sale, creditors are already saying it’s a sweetheart dump job and they’re getting short shrift. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
Arsenal FC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 7:32 am
I have not yet posted on them, but there was a blizzard of rulings by Judges Folsom and Everingham before and during the trial re: the admissibility of settlement licenses based in part on the recent Federal Circuit caselaw on that point, as well as a denial by the FC of a petition for mandamus on the court's order on that point. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:38 pm
Worth a look — they’re things of beauty. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
Noting that a severance would create an additional case and that the Federal Circuit recently counseled in In re VW (the second In re VW by the FC - keep your eyes on the ball here, folks) that the existence of multiple suits involving the same issues is a "paramount consideration" when determining whether a transfer is in the interest of justice, Judge Folsom denied the motion. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:10 pm
Canada (Prime Minister), 2009 FC 405 (CanLII) There are as well ten intervenors: Amnesty International (Canadian Section, English Branch) Human Rights Watch Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children and Justice for Children and Youth British Columbia Civil Liberties Association Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario) Canadian Bar Association Avocats sans frontières Canada Barreau du Québec et Groupe d'étude en droits et… [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:04 am
(Spicy IP) India: Novartis patent rejection by the IPAB: Accessing the decision (Spicy IP) (IAM) India: Likely corruption in the Indian health care sector – Public interest litigation over government shutdown of vaccine production plants to enter contracts with private sector (IP Osgoode) Kenya: Manufacturers, public heath interests clash over anti-counterfeit law; AIDS patients to bring Constitutional challenge (Intellectual Property Watch) (Afro-IP) (Intellectual Property Watch) Spain:… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 1:13 am
On Twitter, we're inventionsofman. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:51 am
So surviving FC #1 gets 25% of the estate, the surviving child of FC #2 gets 25% of the estate, the four surviving grandchildren of FC #3 each get 6.25% of the estate, and the surviving great-grandchild of FC #4 gets 25% of the estate.The trial court, by the way, thought that only the FCs and children of FCs got to share. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:32 am
The issue of disclosure has already been conclusively decided by the Supreme Court of Canada and, therefore, cannot be re-litigated before me. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:09 am
In re McE (Appellant) (Northern Ireland); In re M (Appellant) (Northern Ireland); In re C (AP) and another (AP) (Appellants) (Northern Ireland) [2009] UKHL 15 (11 March 2009) Ofulue and another (FC) (Appellant) v Bossert (FC) (Respondent) [2009] UKHL 16 (11 March 2009) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 3:38 pm
That's even more puzzling in light of the FC's also recent decision in Rentrop v. [read post]
