Search for: "In Re Farrell" Results 241 - 260 of 306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 8:37 am
"We're in the company of the world's worst human rights abusers," she said. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
Instead they're focused on mulcting more money from already-punished Texans who can't afford it or else busting them with the credit agencies. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:26 pm
., June 13, I'll be on a labor panel at the UCLA Altered States Media Conference, sponsored by the UCLA Producers Program and the UCLA Festival for New Creative Works.Here's the panel:10:15 AM - 11:30: Studio and Labor Relations in 2015Moderator: Arnold Peter (Partner, Raskin Peter LLP) * Mike Farrell (Actor, M*A*S*H, Providence) * Jonathan Handel (Attorney, TroyGould Attorneys) * Patric Verrone (President, Writers Guild of America, West) * Sallie Weaver (Founder,… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:02 pm
From the Federal Circuit's In re Kubin decision (citing In re O'Farrell): Specifically, this court observed that an obviousness finding was appropriate where the prior art "contained detailed enabling methodology for practicing the claimed invention, a suggestion to modify the prior art to practice the claimed invention, and evidence suggesting that it would be successful. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
April 13 - April 17, 2009 To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:19 pm
The Federal Circuit's decision in the Kubin case illustrates the possible consequences of misunderstanding, or of Judge Rich's recitation of the "rudiments" of biotechnology from In re O'Farrell as somehow conferring on appellate judges the... [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:14 pm
"  Thus, a claim in biotechnology can sometimes be obvious if it would be "obvious to try," noting that language to the contrary in the Deuel case is no longer good law.Instead, the Federal Circuit quoted its 1988 decision in In re O'Farrell, stating:It is true that this court and its predecessors have repeatedly emphasized that "obvious to try" is not the standard under § 103. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
Karp, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, discuss In re: American Express Merchants' Litigation, a case in which the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:00 pm
"  This may give County Leader Farrell a chance to name his choice. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 9:43 pm
Pearson still has a lawsuit pending against the District of Columbia for not being re-appointed to his administrative law judgeship. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:45 pm
Finally, we're hearing from the A-listers, and it may be enough to pull SAG back from the brink. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 2:21 pm
"We're focused on making the most efficient use of the space we have," he wrote, "and new construction at the site doesn't currently make the most economic sense. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:02 am
FARRELL BACKS HIS VIEWS Deplores Pessimism in Some Quarters ...The date of The New York Times story that bore those headlines? [read post]