Search for: "In Re Harm's Appeal" Results 241 - 260 of 5,771
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2017, 3:17 pm by andrew
Related Cases: National Security Letters (NSLs)In re: National Security Letter 2011 (11-2173)In re National Security Letter 2013 (13-80089)In re National Security Letter 2013 (13-1165) [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:45 am by Neil Rosenbaum
It is not anticipated that the OFT will seek to re-open the case based on the revised theory of harm. - Sue Hinchliffe, Matthew Shultz, & Amy Mudge [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decision not to seek a re-trial in the case of a former News of the World journalist, whose conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal comes as no surprise. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:09 pm by Thomas D. Nevins
Permitting a complex case of extremely dubious merit to proceed would place defendants in a “discovery swamp,” and create “unjustifiable harm to a defendant that only an immediate appeal can avert. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:09 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
Grounds for Granting a Motion for Re-argument On appeal, the appellate court affirmed the trial court ruling. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
(4) Is Article 7(5) of Directive [96/9] to be interpreted as meaning that the repeated and systematic re-utilisation of insubstantial parts of the contents of the database which conflicts with normal exploitation or unreasonably harms the legitimate interests of the database maker is not permissible, or is it sufficient for there to be repeated or systematic re-utilisation? [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:58 am by Rosalind English
Re W (Children) [2010] UKSC 12 SC (Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr) March 3 2010 The facts of this case are set out in the report of the Court of Appeal judgment below. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
It is accepted not only by legal moralists but also by adherents of the harm principle, for example. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:20 am by Barry Sookman
The appellants didn’t appeal the findings of the court that there was a strong case of infringement. [read post]