Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Judges" Results 241 - 260 of 19,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am by Guest Author
But the Court did not apply a deferential standard of review in all administrative interpretation cases, as Judge Friendly explained in Pittson Stevedoring Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:23 am by Mark Ashton
During breaks in hearings on these subjects, judges often tease counsel about having to listen to all of this. [read post]
” Because the state statute altering the selection process for the board members was valid on its face—Disney conceded that absent a retaliatory motive the state could adopt the change in governance structure that it did—Disney could not prevail on a claim that the legislature had enacted the statute to retaliate against Disney for its speech.In support of this “settled law,” Judge Windsor invoked a 2015 case from the Eleventh Circuit (in which the district… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:10 am by Catherine Reach
A Federal Judge may be able to explain why the metadata in an opinion that she penned was not indicative of ghostwriting, but it is better to just remove it and leave no questions. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:34 am
In re Caymus Vineyards, Serial No. 97040804 (February 22, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Wendy B. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:48 am by jordan
What will you do if the worst happens and you’re in a truck crash? [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Corning quite rightly called much of the reasoning of the opinion “nonsense. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:15 pm
The NLJ has Ahead of Opinion Season, Justices Barrett, Sotomayor Speak on Court Civility -- “If we can't survive by tolerating differences, and learning to compromise, and learning to allow one another to express other views, we’re gonna sink," Amy Coney Barrett said during a panel discussion with Sonia Sotomayor.Barrett appeared Friday alongside Justice Sonia Sotomayor for a panel discussion about respectful disagreement moderated by former… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
Notably, none of these cases were decided since Trump appointed three judges to the Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 4:20 am by SHG
But since we’re lawyers, and since we’re already well aware that the premise of making the law available to the public will not produce a more knowledgeable and legally self-reliant populace, but rather a population that gets it stunningly wrong but believes with absolute certainty that they know what they’re talking about because they skimmed the headnote of the decision or the title of the statute, what will AI do to both the general understanding of… [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
  Justice Aylen has some scathing findings re other aspects of AC’s submissions:   [192] While this is sufficient to dispose of Access Copyright’s meritless assertion that participating in the tariff-setting process at all levels (before the Board, this Court, and the Federal Court of Appeal) constituted an offer to pay, the rationale for why the Plaintiffs would have participated sheds further light on the absurdity of Access Copyright’s assertion. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:16 pm by Blake & Dorsten, P.A.
” This was an example of a prosecutor improperly interjecting his personal opinion about the accused’s guilt. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am by Alex Phipps
Chief Judge Dillon, joined by Judge Stading, concurred by separate opinion and suggested that defendant may have committed another offense from common law such as “misconduct in public office. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:40 am
In re Wella Operations US, LLC, Serial No. 97401927 (February 20, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert J. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm by Eric Goldman
A well-drafted and no-nonsense opinion from Judge Barbara Bellis, who also had the displeasure of handling one of Alex Jones’ defamation cases. [read post]