Search for: "In Re Sherman"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
In re Fresh and Process Potatoes Antitrust Litig., No. 4:10–MD–2186 (D. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:32 pm
All in all, the companies racked up fines of nearly $600 million for violations of the Sherman Act. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:47 pm
"The Supreme Court have remanded the case back to the lower court for re-consideration of its section 1 analysis. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
Next week's Texas Lawyer will contain a short article by reporter John Council on the other case from the Eastern District of Texas that was argued right after In re Volkswagen. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:56 am
Law firms fold and are re-cast as new firms. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:44 am
Law firms fold and are re-cast as new firms. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:08 am
The direct purchasers filed their initial class action complaint in October 2010 alleging antitrust violations under both the Clayton and Sherman Acts. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:00 pm
While ticket prices start at $200 -- we're told you'll likely go seatless at that level. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:24 am
Law firms fold and are re-cast as new firms. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:30 am
It re-emphasized the basic distinction between concerted and independent action. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:26 am
In re: Flat Glass Antitrust Litig. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:29 pm
” In re Puerto Rican Cabotage Antitrust Litig., ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:33 am
” In re Comcast Corp. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:22 am
” In re Cox Enterprises, Inc., Set-Top Cable Television Box Antitrust Litig., ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:45 am
” Id.Download PDF file of In re Household Goods Transfer Order [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 1:48 am
A violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act requires additional facts not present here, including an agreement between two parties. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
In re Apple, at 1. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:29 am
"It seems they're becoming more restrictive in interpreting the rights of the patentee," said Wetherell. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:19 am
In re American Express Merchants Litigation, 554 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2009) ("AMEX I"). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:19 am
In re American Express Merchants Litigation, 554 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2009) ("AMEX I"). [read post]
