Search for: "In re: Simmons " Results 241 - 260 of 667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
If the pundits are right, there is zero chance that the Court will take this controversial issue when they’re still down a Justice. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:34 pm by Nikki Siesel
See In re Robert Simmons, Inc., 192 U.S.P.Q. 331 1976 WL 21133 (TTAB 1976) where it was held that WHITE SABLE was not deceptive of an artist’s paint brush. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:14 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Himmelreich, re-posted from SCOTUSblog, with permission: If you read the briefs in Simmons v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 10:36 am
Former Guest Kat, Darren Meale, of Simmons & Simmons, London, recently shared his preliminary thoughts on Article 28 declarations. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 3:50 am by SHG
Simmons Housemaster John Essigmann first introduced the idea last month. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm by MBettman
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), (banning the death penalty for juveniles who committed their crimes before the age of 18), Graham v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:30 am by Tom Simmons
Tom Simmons Kai Lyu explains some of the unique characteristics of Chinese trust law in Re-Clarifying China’s Trust Law: Characteristics and New Conceptual Basis. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:55 am by Gail Lamarche
Appraisal Panel Adam Palmer (LandQuest Commercial) moderated the next discussion panel, comprised of the following well-respected local appraisers: Gerald Hendry (Maxwell, Hendry, and Simmons, LLC) speaking about the Lee County market, Steven D. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:05 am
– History), Legal Re-Ordering in the British Empire: On the Struggles to Build a Global Imperial Order [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:53 am
Former Guest Kat Darren Meale, of Simmons & Simmons in London, has done some hard initial thinking on this and he shares his thoughts with Kat readers. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:42 pm by Sme
., December 21, 2015) (reversing denialof Supplemental Security Income benefits because ALJ failed to properlyconsider treating physician’s opinion)Simmons v. [read post]