Search for: "In re A. M. (1989)" Results 241 - 260 of 944
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm by Stephen Page
  In a trial a couple of weeks ago in which I and an associate prepared a lengthy chronology summarising 7 lever arch folders of court documents, Senior Counsel told me that it was a blessing to receive, making his job particularly with cross-examination, considerable easier - and could I teach other solicitors to do the same, as it is so rarely done.As an example of what could be in a chronology: Date Event/Allegation Source 12/6/14 Child Fred Aloysius Lucius Smith born (4) 2 … [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:13 am by Matthew Dresden and Sara Xia
And sometimes a seemingly outrageous request has a legitimate purpose, as most famously embodied by Van Halen’s prohibition of brown M&Ms. [read post]
RFK
6 Jun 2018, 11:17 am by Anthony Gaughan
Play like you’re Bobby Kennedy. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Its 1989 ruling in Baby M, in which the state’s highest court held surrogacy contracts invalid as against public policy, was the first opinion on the matter and sparked a national debate about the legality of surrogacy. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Bellinger III and Georgetown law professor Rita M. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:55 pm by Brian Gallini
  Brendan, you’re not going to disappoint any of us. [read post]
15 May 2018, 8:11 am
You're feeling your wants, and I'm stoking your wants, but I might have something else in mind, something that I think is good enough for you or actually better than what you want. [read post]
5 May 2018, 11:45 am by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
” (p.12) Por esta razón el citado publicista dice “Cuando dos o más Estados se ponen de acuerdo sobre un objeto determinado y desean darle valor jurídicamente vinculatorio a dicho acuerdo, celebran un Tratado. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm by David Kris
Garfinkel, 490 U.S. 153 (1989), after a lot of dancing around due to the unusual procedural posture of the case, the Department of Justice ultimately argued in its brief that a federal statute was “unconstitutional to the extent it is interpreted ... to deprive the President of control over dissemination of [classified] information, including to Members of Congress”; that the statute “cannot constitutionally be applied to divest the president of all control over the… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 2:59 pm by Lisa Ouellette
The main justification for introducing such a tribunal is that high litigation costs prevent claimants from pursuing valid small claims.I’m here to provide some perspective from the patent law side, and the short version of my comments is that the idea of a patent small-claims court seems mostly dead in the United States, and I don’t see a reason to revive it.The idea of a patent small-claims court got a bit of traction over 30 years ago at a 1989 conference at the… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:46 am by Tim Sitzmann
In fact, Lucasfilms distributed a licensed Sabacc card game in 1989. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm by Daniel Shaviro
That is not the issue when we're considering the relationship between inequality and growth. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:29 am by John Jascob
Lynch, who served as director of the Division of Enforcement from 1985 to 1989, about the challenges that arose during the 1980s, including the M&A boom and the rise of notorious insider trading cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
The CAF assessment was neither well informed on the housing position nor well considered, but did conclude (to housing dept) “may your department possibly re-open the housing application in respect of [J]. [read post]