Search for: "In re A. S-H" Results 241 - 260 of 9,576
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2021, 9:18 am
  Though -- and, again, I know this will be a total surprise -- "[h]e does, however, acknowledge his prior Texas conviction for possessing child pornography. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:23 pm by Cindy Cohn
Arriba SoftIn Re DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to Reddit, Inc.Google v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 9:30 am by James Jensen
At this point, we’re uncertain when or if the new rule will be effective. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 2:21 am by FHH Law
 (If you’re keeping score, the sections in question are Sections 1.1307(b)(1); 20.3; 20.21(a)(2); 20.21(a)(5); 20.21(e)(2); 20.21(e)(8)(i)(G); 20.21(e)(9)(i)(H); 20.21(f); 20.21(h); 22.9; 24.9; 27.9; 90.203(q); 90.219(b)(1)(i); 90.219(d)(5); and 90.219(e)(5).) [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:54 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Dear Trial Team Supporter: We’re back! [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:36 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The period to re-register in order to maintain TPS status through the program’s termination date, began on January 18 and ended March 19. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
The background is a case captioned In re Joseph H., S227929, from the 2d District, in which the Supreme Court denied review in a 4 to 3 vote, with Justices Liu, Cuellar, and Kruger voting for review. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
If you’ve lived in Boston or Cambridge, you’re familiar with the phrase “dropping the H-Bomb”. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
If you’ve lived in Boston or Cambridge, you’re familiar with the phrase “dropping the H-Bomb”. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 8:43 am
Die Aktien einer AG waren in den Händen dreier Aktionäre. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:07 am by Cheng-yi Liu
 Here are a few highlights from the Commission’s recent H Block Report and Order: H Block licenses will be licensed on an Economic Area basis using a system of competitive bidding (auction schedule yet to be announced). [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:00 am by Stephanie Swing
  The Defendants argued that Plaintiff lost his seaman status when he was re-assigned to a land-based rig; in turn the Defendants argued that because maritime jurisdiction did not attach, Plaintiff could not elect under Rule 9(h). [read post]