Search for: "In re A.D."
Results 241 - 260
of 375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
Finkelstein, 162 A.D.3d 401 (1st Dept. 2008). [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
A.D. 2002); Osburn v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:48 am
Auto Repair, Inc., 148 A.D.2d 324, 325, 538 N.Y.S.2d 539 (N.Y. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Greco, 230 A.D.2d 23 (N.Y. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Shank, 155 A.D.3d 875, 877, 63 N.Y.S.3d 719). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
They’re Losing a Fortune. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:55 am
A.D. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 9:08 am
Tilton, 178 A.D.3d 539, 115 N.Y.S.3d 312 (2019). [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, 142 A.D.3d 210, 216 35 N.Y.S.3d 31, 35 (1st Dept. 2017); In re Texas Health Resources, 472 S.W.3d 895, 901-02 (Tex. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
Inc., 80 A.D.3d 293, 915 N.Y.S.2d 7 (1st Dep’t 2010), lv. granted, N.Y. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:51 pm
See In re Lumbar, 457 B.R. 748 (8th Cir.BAP 2011). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:19 am
Sierra, 231 A.D.2d 907, 647 N.Y.S.2d 891 (4th Dep't 1996). [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, 142 A.D.3d 210, 216 35 N.Y.S.3d 31, 35 (1st Dept. 2017); In re Texas Health Resources, 472 S.W.3d 895, 901-02 (Tex. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, 142 A.D.3d 210, 216 35 N.Y.S.3d 31, 35 (1st Dept. 2017); In re Texas Health Resources, 472 S.W.3d 895, 901-02 (Tex. [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:33 pm
If you believe you’re a victim of “wage theft” and you’re ready to fight back, you should call DiTommaso-Lubin. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 9:22 am
Sierra, 231 A.D.2d 907, 647 N.Y.S.2d 891 (4th Dep't 1996). [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:44 am
A.D. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
., 2006], affd, 44 A.D.3d 355 [1st Dept. 2007]):Under New York principles of contract interpretation, however, strict rules of grammar do not have the last word, when a grammatical construction of a contract is inconsistent with the parties' intent. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
