Search for: "In re April B." Results 241 - 260 of 3,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 4:05 pm by Buce
Urgent exhortation: if you're going to be anywhere near New York City between now and April 17, bop on over to the Duke on 42d Street and catch Peter Brook's Love is My Sin. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:39 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
April 26, 2020 “In some lost fold of the past, we wanted to be lions and we’re no more than castrated cats. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:35 am by Victoria VanBuren
In In re Lopez, 372 S.W. 3d 174 (June 8, 2012) the Supreme Court of Texas conditionally granted mandamus relief because the trial court abused its discretion by incorrectly applying section 171.096(b) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code instead of applying 171.096(c) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:30 am
In re Magnesium Oxide Antitrust Litigation, 2012 WL 1150123 (D.N.J., April 5, 2012). [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:49 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
, the unfairness of a student with an A exam getting a B grade based upon the professor's error) and why they might not (e.g. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:13 am by mjpetro
Miller appeals his convictions and raises three issues.....The third issue requires reversal of two of Miller's convictions and a remand for re-sentencing on the third. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm by PaulKostro
., A-1095-06T4, April 18, 2011: N.J.R.E. 404(b) provides that “evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the disposition of a person in order to show that such person acted in conformity therewith. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 4:35 am
In re Biobu SARL, Serial No. 90730546 (March 26, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 2:46 pm
See In re Root, 2006 WL 1050687, at 3 (Bankr.N.D.Iowa April 11, 2006) (BAPCPA amended § 521(a)(2) by deleting the term "consumer" as a modifier of "debts"). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:29 am
Perhaps the Examiner was simply unfamiliar with the fine points of the use/sale rejection because they're relatively rare in prosecution. [read post]