Search for: "In re Barton"
Results 241 - 260
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am
Voting Disenfranchisement and Elections Let’s pretend this time you’re a shareholder. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 12:54 am
Part 1: The trade mark registration process Chapter 2, by Barton Beebe and Jeanne Fromer, addresses "trade mark depletion", i.e. the hypothesis that there is a limited supply of signs that can usefully serve as a trademark and that we're running out [earlier work here]. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 2:16 pm
Barton, 192 F.3d 662 (7th Cir. 1999). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
If they’re trying to hide the fact that they’re running ads, mission accomplished. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
In re Stroming’s Will, 12 N.J. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:18 pm
Please contact me directly (Susan Schneider) if you know of law school work that we can highlight.We begin with Harvard Law School where noted food law expert Peter Barton Hutt has taught a very popular course on Food & Drug Law for many years. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Transformative use has a stampeding effect, as Barton Beebe says, on the four factor analysis. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Barton Beebe: Intellectual movements—do they have any effect on TM law? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Discussant: Barton Beebe Adidas v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
What we’re worried about there is inauthenticity—weakening of the narrative. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:14 am
Our pitch (John Garvey, Karen Barton) was on the University of New Hampshire project, combining Daniel Webster Scholar Honors capstone programme + Standardized Clients + SIMPLE. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Barton Beebe, New York University School of Law Traffix is defensible if you think TM has grown too powerful; the chaos comes from the Federal Circuit’s refusal to follow it. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 11:30 pm
That’s why we’re dependent on people who come from somewhere else. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 8:15 am
” In re Marriage of Hartney, 355 Ill. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
Barton, 15-580, a state-on-top habeas case that couldn’t get granted even with two relists. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Perhaps if you’re the one who doesn’t have lots of empirical evidence, you lose. [read post]
2 May 2025, 9:02 am
But reasons to resist this conclusion: whether they’re serving a source-indicating function (or content-indicating function) but also what the costs of recognizing such protection are (cf. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 11:49 am
So the harassment statute is still on the books in Texas although lawyers are hoping the Supreme Court will take up the case.Barton Challenge• Case: Ex parte Barton• Issue: The intermediate court of appeals held that § 42.07 (a) (7) of the Penal Code, which pertains to electronic harassment, is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad under the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 11:06 am
Barton, K., Cunningham, Jones, C.G., Maharg, P. (2006). [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 3:07 am
But then, as long as we’re musing about impossibilities, go big or go home. [read post]
