Search for: "In re Cal. E." Results 241 - 260 of 1,058
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Similarly, in In re Lifschutz (1970) 2 Cal.3d 415 (Lifschutz), we rejected the petitioner's claim that if the state could compel disclosure of some psychotherapeutic communications, psychotherapy could no longer be practiced successfully. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 2:13 am by Keith Mallinson
" As indicated in the next three endnotes, I have analysed the failings in the first three of Apple's proposed measures for "Reshaping FRAND — Licensing, Litigation & Competition Law" including:“Base = derived from smallest priceable component (i.e. baseband)”[2]“Rate = no higher than adjusted pro-rata share of SEPs”[3]“Control for quality, over-declaration & royalty stacking”[4]“Build favorable, arms-length… [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 6:46 am
In their own words (with my crude translation):El presente trabajo pretende ofrecer algunas interpretaciones y evidencias que ayuden a res- paldar los argumentos ofrecidos en esta introducción. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed September 6, and later ordered published on October 7, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying plaintiff groups’ writ petition challenging Sonoma County’s use permit and related mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a winery project in the County’s rural Knights Valley area. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 4:36 pm
  One of my readers sent me an e-mail about it, and I (of course) went back and changed the post. [read post]