Search for: "In re D. W." Results 241 - 260 of 4,547
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
The headline grabber for the week is the opinion in In re: Sealed Case, which revealed that Special Counsel Jack Smith subpoenaed Twitter’s records related to Donald Trump’s Twitter account. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
I’d probably offer excerpts from all of the different opinions in that case to offer the students a comprehensive view of where things sit today. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
Twenty Years of The IPKat was published by Oxford University Press in spring 2023.And, speaking of the book, we are happy to re-publish the review that Bill Patry (Mayer Brown) provided of it, as just published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
 August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy  In B.D. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But none reached the market despite millions in R&D from National Institute of Justice. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Genesis: G-d said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Smagin, a RICO extraterritoriality opinion decided just one week before Abitron, Justice Sotomayor reminded us that “[d]ual rationales support the presumption . . . . [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
R., 2023 QCCA 825Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Mark Schrager, Stephen W. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:13 am
In re Panini America, Inc., Serial No. 88960212 (July 12, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:17 am by Giles Peaker
We’re a small organisation with a big voice. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am by Dan Lopez
But the thing that’s really curious here is that the majority opinion in this case, because there was two opinions, there was a majority opinion authored by Judge Smith, George W. [read post]