Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 241 - 260
of 533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 8:43 am
” The ATF is achieving this not by issuing new regulations (re)defining what it means to be “engaged in the business” of selling guns under federal law. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 4:46 pm
If you’re in Chicago next week, and even if you’re not, go check out the Second Annual Searle Center Antitrust Economics and Competition Policy conference at Northwestern University School of Law. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:35 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 12:30 am
"Also up on H-Net is a review of William C. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 2:26 pm
… Why would you want great health benefits if you’re not going to use them? [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 1:28 pm
Rules, Res 7306.01 to .04. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:03 pm
If you are interested in administrative law (and perhaps even if you're not), this symposium is highly recommended (at least until I contribute). [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:19 pm
The government did not lost on every issue, however, as Lawrence also held that some of the state’s other claims, such as that the employer mandate is unconstitutional on federalism grounds, were barred by res judicata. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:21 am
(The Court also issued a one-line per curiam in In re Grand Jury, dismissing that case as improvidently granted.) [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:43 am
In CRS’s view, HHS cannot pay them the $8 billion they’re set to receive through the program.* In a normal political environment, this wouldn’t be a big deal. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:20 am
For nearly a full minute, Fair is silent, and only starts speaking after we're a good way through Sublime's "Santeria. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:15 am
Maybe that’s a good thing, but law schools will respond to what they’re rewarded for, and currently there is little outside of indulging in one’s “preference” for fellow faculty that law schools have to consider. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:19 pm
Yet that laudable legislative-branch prescription, in place for the last seventy years, has recently been re-envisioned by the executive. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:28 am
From my perch in northeast Ohio, however, I hear this sentiment all the time: “Sure, Trump has a troubled relationship with the truth (and I wish he’d stop with the tweeting), but it’s not like we can trust the mainstream media; they lie, too, and they’re not on our side. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 9:12 am
In re Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:51 pm
Consider this exchange between Chief Justice Roberts and Solicitor General Prelogar: CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: . . . you're saying that Congress acted. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 1:33 pm
The Trump Administration faces another legal setback in its effort to reform federal environmental regulation.A federal district court in South Carolina has issued an injunction against the Trump EPA's attempt to "suspend" the Obama Administration's WOTUS ("waters of the United States") rule pending the agency's completion of an attempted regulatory re-write. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:10 pm
As I’ve explained at length before, it took three decades to get this far into the downward spiral, and it sometimes appears as if we’re past the point of no return. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:48 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
GENERAL PRELOGAR: But also never with attention to the remedial arguments that we're making here, and I—I don't think it's ever too late for this Court to give the statute its proper construction when you actually look at its text, context, and history. [read post]
