Search for: "In re R.C."
Results 241 - 260
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 10:04 am
After reviewing the issue in preparation for the interview, it became readily apparent this was a law in serious need of a re-write. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:10 pm
” [via LexisOne] In re Curtis F. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
On remand, Common Pleas Judge Judy Hunter ordered re-testing of the bite mark DNA with current, more sophisticated testing methods. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:27 am
So, does this mean if you’re representing a defendant in a post-conviction proceeding, you can get around Steckman by having your drinking buddy make the public records request? [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:47 am
(The Federal statute is 18 USC §922(g); Ohio has the weapons under disability statute, R.C. 2923.13.) [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:42 am
But we’re certain to see more R.C. shenanigans in the coming weeks, because the head office is planning to open storefronts and Andy has tasked Dwight with coming up with a crack sales team to concoct a concept and open the stores. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Res. 36 (2005) 267-288. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Baccala (Conn. 2017) (calling a store manager a "fat ugly bitch," and worse, and saying, "fuck you, you're not a manager," were not "fighting words" under facts of the case); People in the Interest of R.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:30 am
Today’s ethics question: If you’re a lawyer and your client wants you to do something like this, do you do it? [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:51 am
Motors Corp., after questions about the constitutionality of R.C. 4123.93 and 4123.931 were raised. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
The 8th remanded the case for re-sentencing, but the resentencing didn’t occur until March 2006, about three weeks after Foster came down. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
LEXIS 8294 (Cal 8/26/2010) In re Richardson, 2010 Cal. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
Geter-Gay: Although there were minor inconsistencies in what the victim said, the jury did not lose its way in finding that defendant failed to prove she acted in self-defense for felonious assault (R.C. 2903.11). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am
Gonzalez, doesn’t think so, noting that “the Ohio Supreme Court has not held that a judgment of conviction is rendered void by the imposition of multiple sentences in violation of R.C. 2941.25? [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:40 am
That means any tie votes would uphold the appellate decision below, or such a case could be re-argued. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:06 am
What about res judicata? [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:28 am
Anayasa Mahkemesi, üçüncü kişinin elinde haczedilen mala muhafaza tedbiri uygulanabilmesine izin veren İcra ve İflâs Kanunu m. 88/2’deki “alacaklının muvafakatı ve” ifadesini Anayasaya aykırı bularak iptal etmiştir. 6352 sayılı Kanunla 88. maddede buna göre düzenleme yapılmış ve kural olarak üçüncü kişinin elinde iken haczedilen malın… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
There’s also a “best evidence rule” argument, but we’re not quarrelling with that. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:23 am
” R.C. 2901 .22(B). [read post]
