Search for: "In re TM"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2011, 11:12 am
No, they’re coming from Sega! [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:09 am
There are two broad schools of thoughts on information disclosure: paranoid and open, and they're both sort of proven right here. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
| Who can use "Duke" as TM in the US? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:30 am
Recently I was wearing something with a W and the little TM, and a friend asked, incredulously, "Can they really trademark the letter W? [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
The First Defendant was a subcontractor to the Third Defendant, and the Second Defendant was responsible for re- marking lane lines on the motorway. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
McKenna: if hedonic value gives form to TM law, you’re coming from a position of rights in gross, and now you need to tell me what the limits are, which you can only do by talking about countervailing interests. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:07 am
(No, we’re not sure that line makes entire sense, but you get the idea.) [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 11:31 pm
Last year the company formerly known as "AllAdvantage" (also once described by Forbes as "the dumbest dot com" and by another publication as "the bloated whale of Silicon Valley") re-emerged as AGLOCO. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
And if you’re talking about a news photo, you can’t transform that if it’s just how the person looks. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
In Europe, for example, they’re considering revising their version of functionality, and it’s bubbling in the US too. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:00 am
Those of you not following us on Twitter (we’re at @95years) might have missed out on a remarkable run of news stories about questionable trademark enforcement efforts by fast food companies. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:19 pm
Using distinctiveness for infringement seems to be TM-like—in the bow wow wow case, they’re protecting more of a TM interest than a © interest and using “distinctive” entrenches that problem. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:30 pm
After a panic-filled dash back to re-re-rewrite his paper tomorrow, IPKat team member Jeremy returned to the fray, coming in at the tail end of a fascinating session on initial interest confusion in trade mark law. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:22 pm
This one is the best. https://t.co/zdRrUNwsW2 — Professor Bainbridge (@ProfBainbridge) November 23, 2016 You're also going to need a carving knife for your... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
We’re not in that world any more. [read post]
Suffolk University Law School IP Center, Fourth Annual Intellectual Property & Innovation Conference
30 Sep 2022, 8:21 am
Any later designs aren’t based off the first dates—they’re 15 years from issuance, not filing. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
Recording studio engineers speak in hushed tones about the 1073 microphone pre-amplifier, and not just because they're habitually conditioned to keeping their voices down in the studio's control room. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Distinction between reactive and proactive functions of TM law. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:27 am
” The audio component of the track is a re-recorded version of a popular song that omits the lead vocals, while the graphic component displays the lyrics to the song as well as a variety of visual cues (including color coding and various icons) that are synchronized with the music. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
They’re extremely weak as a result. [read post]
