Search for: "In the Interest of D. M. (Dissenting Opinion)" Results 241 - 260 of 716
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The few cases we see are examples of patterns which exist more broadly in the justice system, but only rarely show up in state appellate court opinions. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
To make things more confusing, Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion reversing course, while Justice O’Connor (actually, Chief Justice O’Connor) wrote the dissent – just not the ones you think. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:17 pm by Robert Chesney
It will be interesting to see if the majority’s opinion touches on it in any way; if I’m not mistaken, a question references something along these lines did come up in the oral argument. [read post]
1 May 2018, 3:36 pm by Chris Attig
Take a read of what they wrote in dissents to the denial of cert in the Mathis appeal. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
I’m afraid one of my biggest criticisms of this book is rather fuzzy: that is to say, in my opinion this book lacks “background music. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
But I’m pleased that many lawyers enjoy the book as well. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am by Florian Mueller
No one will act in the interest of the collectivity of all petitioners; as always in litigation, each party will do what serves its own interests. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm by Marty Lederman
  In particular, defenders of the practice might point to dicta from the Supreme Court that courts of equity “may, and frequently do, go much fartherboth to give and withhold relief in furtherance of the public interest than they are accustomed to go when only private interests are involved. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 HIAWATHA HENRY, ADDIE HARRIS, MONTRAY NORRIS, AND ROOSEVELT COLEMAN, JR., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED, Petitioners,v.CASH BIZ, LP, CASH ZONE, LLC D/B/A CASH BIZ, AND REDWOOD FINANCIALS, LLC, Respondents.No. 16-0854.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued September 15, 2017.Opinion delivered: February 23, 2018. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:39 pm by Mark Walsh
’—you know, I guess you’d have to say the law is that [if] the prince buys a department store in Iowa, I’m sorry, he’s just like another Iowan. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that “[m]embers of the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:08 am by Ken White
I'm not going to move anyone off of any opinion about James Damore and am not interested in trying. [read post]