Search for: "In the Interest of KB" Results 241 - 260 of 347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2024, 2:16 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 24 July 2024, there was an application by the Defendant in Sully & others v Mazur KB-2024-001330. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
In the first legal test of the Legitimate Interests Exception, which is available under the Personal Data Protection Act, the commission found RedMart had satisfied the requirements of the exception. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Driver v CPS [2022] EWHC 2500 (KB) My second case also concerns law enforcement investigations, this time the passing of a file from the CPS and the disclosure of that fact to a third party. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
On 1 August 2024 judgment was handed down in the preliminary issue trial of Paisley v Linehan [2024] EWHC 1976 (KB). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:40 pm by Volker 'Falk' Metzler
In the interests of legal certainty, DQMS can advise other departments to issue corrections or refund fees only if there is a legal basis for them to do so. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:46 am
Locker, [1948] 1 KB 349) and the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Department For Environment Food & Rural Affairs v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am by INFORRM
David Richards J emphasised that the open justice principle is not a mere procedure rule, but a fundamental common law principle; any departure from the principle is permitted only if it is necessary in the interests of justice; and the the party seeking to establish that necessity must do so by clear and cogent evidence which will be subjected to careful scrutiny by the court. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:15 am by Jennifer González
Interested in the nexus between creative industries and law, I’ve worked in recent years at South Korea’s national broadcasting system (KBS), a small media and culture content startup, as well as at the Media Diversity and Social Change Initiative (MDSCI) at the University of Southern California. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
Whereas the statutory tenancy is unassignable, not an estate in land but a mere "personal right of occupation" (see Lord Greene MR in Carter v SU Carburetter Co [1942] 2 KB 288, 291), a secure tenancy is an orthodox estate in land which, subject to specific restrictions in the 1980 Act, can be assigned, held in joint names, pass by survivorship and be disposed of by will on death. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:06 am by John Newcome, Kelly Benefits Strategies
John Newcome is Vice President and Senior Consultant with Kelly Benefits Strategies (KBS). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm by NL
Whereas the statutory tenancy is unassignable, not an estate in land but a mere "personal right of occupation" (see Lord Greene MR in Carter v SU Carburetter Co [1942] 2 KB 288, 291), a secure tenancy is an orthodox estate in land which, subject to specific restrictions in the 1980 Act, can be assigned, held in joint names, pass by survivorship and be disposed of by will on death. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
In Dyson v Channel Four Television Corporation [2022] EWHC 2718 (KB) (31 October 2022) at first instance, Nicklin J said: 18. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Duma was awarded $500,000 in aggravated damages plus $45,000 in interest. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am by CMS
” As noted by Lord Leggatt, English courts have traditionally applied the “same interest” test rigorously, particularly in light of the Court of Appeal’s key ruling in Markt & Co v Knight Steamship [1910] 2 KB 1021. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
The Same interest criteria Lloyd made the following submissions with respect to the same interest criteria regarding of loss of control: Claiming uniform sums in respect of loss of control satisfies the same interest criteria. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
There was no public interest that central or local government organs should be allowed to sue for libel: it was actually contrary to the public interest. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
This balancing of interests would become a key feature in later privacy cases, particularly involving the press’s publication of personal information: “[It] is a simple reflection of the common view that one person should so far as possible be entitled to tell another person to mind his own business. [read post]