Search for: "J.P. V. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2007, 11:43 am
" Involuntary Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of J.P. and Tiffany Price v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:32 am
Mar 27, 2007) (NO. 401726/06)Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, (James J. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo, Respondent,vNew York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government, Appellant.Calendar Date:February 16, 2024Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Dustin J. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo, Respondent,vNew York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government, Appellant.Calendar Date:February 16, 2024Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Dustin J. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dan v City of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02659Decided on May 14, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 14, 2024Before: Oing, J.P., González, Kennedy, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ.Index No. 21313/16 Appeal No. 2265 Case No. 2023-03010[*1]Janet Dan,… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dan v City of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02659Decided on May 14, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 14, 2024Before: Oing, J.P., González, Kennedy, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ.Index No. 21313/16 Appeal No. 2265 Case No. 2023-03010[*1]Janet Dan,… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1036,… [read post]