Search for: "JACKSON v. USA"
Results 241 - 260
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
Greg Stohr at Bloomberg and Joan Biskupic at USA Today also have news reports on the opinion. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:00 pm
Today I will talk about where it is showing up, US v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:06 am
At USA Today, Joan Biskupic covers another of this week’s rulings, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
. --- Don Hopey, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, February 25, 2010 The Federal Aviation Administration issued a “determination of no hazard” January 21, 2010 for the proposed Gamesa Energy USA wind energy project that would put 30 windmills atop an ecologically sensitive ridge on Shaffer Mountain in Somerset County, Pennsylvania. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:08 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-2279; USA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
USA, Inc., 566 F.3d 989, 989-99 (Fed. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:10 am
The New York Times, December 5, 2009 Saturday, Late Edition - Final, Section A; Column 0; Metropolitan Desk; Pg. 15, 876 words, Mayor v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Cinemark USA, Inc., NY Sup. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
., USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, Pub. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 5:44 am
[Ideas/Atlantic] * Legal experts and prosecutors are grappling with the Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art) US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on preferred… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
