Search for: "Jack Daniel"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am
Jack Daniel’s offers a similar argument on the dilution statute. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court Jack Daniel’s case, a free speech fight over a dog toy” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 1:16 pm
“Jack Daniel’s, Confusion, and the Problematic Origin Story of this Blog’s Name”: Michael C. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:06 am
There is no general answer to that question, but Professor Dorf's column yesterday -- "Jack Daniel's, Confusion, and the Problematic Origin Story of this Blog's Name" -- presents an opportunity to explore some nuances through an example in which we have access to an unusually large amount of the relevant facts.The fundamental issue is whether the punny inspiration for this blog's name -- a series of videos in the 1980's by the comedian Tim… [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 5:04 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Jack Daniel's says no; VIP Products says yes. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
VIP Prods., LLC, and yes, the petitioner is that Jack Daniel’s. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:22 am
Is in. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. filed its reply brief with the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. filed its reply brief with the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:49 am
Bragg’s office convened the grand jury to evaluate business-related matters, including Trump’s role in hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels that were classified as a legal expense. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:37 pm
In Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 4:28 am
Jack Forrest reports for CNN. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 10:00 am
The family had scrupulously avoided hamburger and Jack in the Box. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:55 am
(Daniel Kim / The Seattle Times) IN JULY 1990, I wrote a story for The News Tribune in Tacoma that was headlined: “There may be a bug in that burger. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Gorsuch’s opinion says the Lanham Act exercises considerable care in mens rea, which is then picked up by Jack Daniels; redefining section 43 remedies. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The decision by the special counsel, Jack Smith, to subpoena Ivanka Trump and Kushner underscores how deeply into the former president’s inner circle that Smith is reaching and is the latest sign no potential high-level witness is off limits. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:29 am
I'm filing an amicus today on behalf of First Amendment scholars:Enrique Armijo, Professor of Law, Elon University School of Law Lisa Pondrom Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law Rebecca Tushnet, Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law School John Villasenor, Professor of Law and Electrical Engineering, UCLA; Founder and Faculty Co-Director, UCLA Institute for Technology, Law and Policy Eugene Volokh, Gary T. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Jack Daniel’s view is that a company selling a commercial product that makes humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s brand should not be entitled to First Amendment protection. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm
Vara, January 13th Objection; Jack Schickler, CoinDesk). [read post]
