Search for: "James v. Holder"
Results 241 - 260
of 646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
The decision by Justice Tremblay-Lamer in Bell Canada v ITVBOX.NET 2016 FC 612 to grant the injunction was not surprising. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:43 am
James, 353 F.3d 606, 613 (8th Cir. 2003) (holding that accessing CDs given by defendant to a friend violated Fourth Amendment). [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
(emphasis added) Geist also complains that the objectives set out in the IP chapter of the TPP do not maintain “a balance between rights holders and users on all IP provisions”. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:28 pm
In Apple v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
” Palermo Land Co., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
But his expression of puzzlement in Hugunin v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
You can read more about how Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm
” In one, James v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Under the 1996 Broadcasting Act Ofcom is charged with making sure licence holders are “fit and proper” persons to hold the licence. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:30 pm
Comey v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Monitor 13D, F and G positions of top institutional holders, including their investment philosophy, exit horizon, historical cost basis, and any parallel trading activity. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
AT & T's records listed James Lowe as the account holder, 2204 Robin Street as the billing address, and Lowe.Stacy@yahoo. com as the email address associated with the account. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
On the one hand, many would now argue that it is unconscionable for an office holder to fail in her obligations, one solidified through her oath, to do her duty. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
It is styled, Sandra James v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
A frame from Joseph Teixeira’s YouTube video (depicting Mayor James T. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:17 am
AT & T's records listed James Lowe as the account holder, 2204 Robin Street as the billing address, and Lowe. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
Although such advertisements use trademarked terms in commerce and are geared toward increasing the ad buyer’s business at the trademark holder’s expense, they do not implicate the Lanham Act because they draw a clear distinction between the products and do not imply the trademark holder’s sponsorship or approval. [read post]
