Search for: "Jane Doe 1-6" Results 241 - 260 of 466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2019, 8:13 am by rstokes
At a given time, approximately 6-10% of incarcerated women are pregnant (3). [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by Jonathan Spontarelli
The fee hike will take effect on July 1 and is expected to generate enough to cover the cost of new software. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Williams-Yulee does not mark a "clear shift" in this Court's jurisprudence and does not allow for broad restrictions on judicial candidate speech [A.] [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654, involves an unaccompanied teenager (known as “Jane Doe” to protect her privacy) who was caught trying to enter the United States illegally. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit’s opinion does not discuss that theory, even though the district court had invoked it to certify the class. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Jane Schmane (to use a somewhat less common name than the usual Joe Schmoe) routinely yields a false quote reporting on her supposedly having been found guilty of malpractice. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:11 am by Deborah Schander
What they all want.[6][1] Weeeell, I don't currently read Thor. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS UKHRB posts Courts should take note of Strasboug’s doctrine of deference July 6, 2012 Rosalind English Does a Zimbabwe farm invader get refugee status? [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Affiliated Ute Does Not Apply to Claims Based Primarily on Misstatements The Second Circuit agreed with defendants that the district court should not have given plaintiffs the benefit of the Affiliated Ute Adhering to two of its prior decisions, the court held that Affiliated Ute does not apply to claims based “primarily” on affirmative misstatements, as opposed to omissions.[6] The court noted that the alleged omissions were “simply the inverse”… [read post]