Search for: "Janssen v. Janssen" Results 241 - 260 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2021, 1:31 am by Rose Hughes
 The Judge, citing previous Canadian case law, also dismissed the argument that the presence of an unexpected technical effect ("golden bonus" Janssen v Teva, 2015 FC 184) could rescue a claim that was obvious to try, given that "if a patentee obtains a workable formulation, the later discovery of one of its inherent characteristics does not add anything inventive to what had already been discovered" (para. [594], citing 2012 FC 410). [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:35 am by Race to the Bottom
(Nasdaq, Rule 5801; Nasdaq, Rule 5830; Cory Janssen, Investopedia). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:07 pm by Kelly
Supreme Court to take on patent settlement agreements: Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co et al v Bayer et al (FDA Law Blog) US: BIO joins 170 business, research institutions and organisations to urge caution in Microsoft v i4i case (PatentlyBIOtech) US: Galderma wins important victory in fight against Leo’s psoriasis patent covering vitamin D, corticosteroid composition for ‘dermal use’ (Reexamination Alert) US: Déjà vu! [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
   In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin) – US: District Court New Jersey grants summary judgment of non-infringement in favour of Hospira, Teva and others concerning patent relating to Sanofi’s Eloxatin: Sanofi-Aventis v Sandoz (SmartBrief) (The IP Factor) (GenericsWeb) (Patents4Life) General Europe’s ever changing landscape… [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:05 am
Hoffmann-La Roche (Patent Docs) Razadyne (Galanthamine) - US: CAFC: You can’t rely on test results that weren’t available when your patent application was filed: Janssen Pharma and Synaptech v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
$16.8 million for Alphapharm and Mylan: Takeda v Mylan (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) Boniva (Ibandronic acid) – US: Apotex challenges validity of Hoffmann-La Roche’s Boniva patent (Law360) Boniva (Ibandronic acid) – US: Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals and Orgenus Pharma seek declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement in patent infringement suit brought by Hoffmann-La Roche over Boniva (Law360) Cardizem (Diltiazem) – Antitrust,… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:58 pm by Marie Louise
Cephalon (Patently-O) Seroquel (Quetiapine) – UK: Teva launches High Court action to revoke AstraZeneca’s European patent (IP Factor) Synagis – US: PDL BioPharma Synagis patent invalidated: Medimmune v PDL BioPharma (Patent Docs) Tarka (Trandolapril, Verapamil) – US: Glenmark loses jury verdict in DNJ over Tarka (IPBiz) Wechol (Colesevelam) – US: Watson confirms Welchol oral suspension patent challenge (SmartBrief) [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:31 pm by Dennis Crouch
Janssen Pharmaceutica (appealing institution denials); Apple Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:49 pm by Aaron Barkoff
Forest (where the Federal Circuit held that blocking a generic drug company from selling a noninfringing product presents a justiciable controversy) than in Janssen v. [read post]