Search for: "January v. Sullivan*"
Results 241 - 260
of 410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
It would explain a lot: (1) the mysterious period in between the initial incident of alleged harassment, in May 2006, and Aaron's filing a pro se Complaint in New York Supreme Court, in January 2007;(2) Aaron's general skittishness about discussing his prior representation (and the circumstances of its termination); and(3) S&C's initial statement that it rejected his demand for a "multi-million dollar" settlement (i.e., they were willing to fork over a few… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:00 am
As they contemplate doing so, those owners and their tax advisors should carefully review the Fourteenth Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
—PART V— Not all Native Advertising May Be Commercial Speech under the First Amendment If there is one thing clear from the case law, it is that the commercial speech analysis under the First Amendment is a fact intensive one that does not clearly lend itself to bright lines, especially when dealing with mixed commercial and noncommercial speech. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
A federal district court upheld the law but, in January, a divided Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc in Democratic National Committee v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
Claims can also be made in malicious falsehood, on proof of falsehood, malice (in the sense of improper motive) and actual loss Prosecution for libel is not now possible as a result of s 73 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (in force from 12th January 2010). [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
I plan on filing the brief Friday, January 15, so if you have comments by Thursday, January 14, I'd love to hear them. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:47 am
In McCollum v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
On January 29, 2015, this Court entered an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Reinstatement [6] of Cure and Denying Defendant’s Motion for Declaratory Relief (dkt. #89), directing Foss to pay for the trial SCS. 16. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:01 pm
Charney v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:09 am
Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:50 pm
Expect Harpdrygal V to be a blast this year! [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:44 am
US Supreme Court Rules in Securities Fraud Statute of Limitations Case As noted in the D&O Diary Blog, earlier this week, the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Merck v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:42 am
The panel found in Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:58 am
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Charney v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:14 am
The plaintiffs’ lawyers, led by Joseph Sellers of Washington's Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, has asked for an 8% cut, or $60.8 million, for the work performed in Keepseagle v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:22 pm
In Maples v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
In the case of Lascaris v. [read post]
