Search for: "John Doe and/or Jane Doe, #2"
Results 241 - 260
of 405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
“Religion, Democracy, and Equality” August 21-23, 2013 ICLARS Program Draft Wednesday August 21, 2013 Hilton Garden Inn Richmond, Virginia Young Scholar Sessions 2-2:50 p.m. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
Table of Contents Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
19 May 2013, 10:05 pm
For example, I love being able to quickly say "send a message to my wife that I am running 5 minutes late" or "remind me when I get to work to call John Doe" or "add milk to my grocery list" and have the iPhone instantly obey using the Messages and Reminders apps. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:00 am
There are growing questions about the strategic success of the drone war (I quote Jane Harman and Stanley McChrystal, but could have cited many others). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
‘, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly April 11, 2013 [Abstract] Digital Media Law Project, Berkman Center: We Have a New Name Professor Patrick Keyzer (lead author), Jane Johnston, Sharon Rodrick, Anne Wallace, Geoff Holland and Mark Pearson. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 10:31 am
Defendant John Doe 1, who operated a website about the law school, sought a protective order and moved to quash the subpoena to his Internet service provider. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Speech #2—Parlor B Anjali S. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
See also John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
See also John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
John Marshall, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and Benjamin Cardozo are among the Supreme Court justices who have grappled with how to interpret the jurisdictional phrase “arising under. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:34 am
Somewhat more radically, if one agrees law does not have a nature, but a culture, then one must account for how the culture of law changes, and has changed, over time. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
” John Locke’s writings on property embraced this wider meaning of property as well. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:45 am
For example, suppose candidate John Smith were to claim that his opponent, incumbent Jane Doe, "would be in favor of budget measures that would cost individual taxpayers up to $3,000. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
http://bit.ly/Xn9i9o (Sandra Serkes) Technology: Ethics Meets eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/UGb4wj (John Cowling, Daniel Nelson) That E-mail Is Mine; Or Is It? [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:31 pm
Assume John Doe and Jane Doe create a revocable trust and both name themselves as trustees. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:46 am
For example, Jane Doe creates a film. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
” Id. at 2. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:23 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0460, 2012 MT 201, MONTANA CANNABIS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, MARK MATTHEWS, SHIRLEY HAMP, SHELLY YEAGER, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, MICHAEL GECI-BLACK, M.D., JOHN STOWERS, M.D., POINT HATFIELD, and CHARLIE HAMP, Plaintiffs, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants, v. [read post]
