Search for: "John-Charles v. State of California" Results 241 - 260 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
SETTLEMENTS EPA to Allow States Address Rising Ocean Acidity. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
. --- SanDiego6.com, February 24, 2010 McClellan-Palomar Airport in Carlsbad, California will close alternating weeks starting April 25, when work will begin to replace the 5,000-foot-long runway. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Opinion below (10th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of the American Legion Department of California Amicus brief of nine states Title: CropLife America v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
Finally, the Wall Street Journal’s Jess Bravin recaps a recent interview with Justice John Paul Stevens about former Illinois senator Charles Percy, whom Stevens credits with helping him shape his career as a judge. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
PREPARED BY: Michael Chernicoff Looser Rules on Sentencing Stir Concerns About Equity [online.wsj.com] The Supreme Court cases of The United State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19]             Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]