Search for: "Johnson Adoption Case"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2022, 11:43 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
" To do in this instance, said the Court of Appeals, would require it "to depart from precedent" and require it to assume that the cases upon which plaintiff in his federal action relies held, by implication, that no special duty is required in the respective factual scenarios based on what was omitted from the Court's opinions and this, said the Court of Appeals, it declined to do. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
" To do in this instance, said the Court of Appeals, would require it "to depart from precedent" and require it to assume that the cases upon which plaintiff in his federal action relies held, by implication, that no special duty is required in the respective factual scenarios based on what was omitted from the Court's opinions and this, said the Court of Appeals, it declined to do. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal As GOP Lawmakers Push for More Election Fraud Charges, Prosecutors Find Few Cases MSN – Rosalind Helderman and Amy Gardner (Washington Post) | Published: 3/23/2022 Demands for criminal cases tied to the 2020 election continue to stress the political system and put pressure on prosecutors, particularly elected Republicans. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 5:07 pm
” (Hat tip to Julie Johnson for this language) This language justifying a zero child support obligation after an Illinois divorce or parentage action is the alternative to suggesting that the parties merely “reserve” child support. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:23 am
But it has to be said that Mead Johnson/Bimbo Bakeries analysis is in conflict—not a split, because the same courts that have adopted Mead Johnson say that they accept that implied falsehoods are actionable; they just won’t tell you in advance which ones—because Mead Johnson says that courts are not allowed to recognize some false implications even when shown to exist via empirical evidence. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 9:11 am
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
The Call for Evidence sets out various options for reform including strengthening the public interest defence in the Defamation Act 2013, capping the costs that claimants can recover to stop the high cost of litigation being “weaponised” against free speech, and the introduction of a requirement for claimants to prove “actual malice” in libel cases. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
Even in cases not prohibited by the convention, shining lasers at aircraft is considered a serious safety hazard; if the pilot’s vision is impacted, it could adversely affect the pilot’s ability to safely operate the aircraft. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
Even in cases not prohibited by the convention, shining lasers at aircraft is considered a serious safety hazard; if the pilot’s vision is impacted, it could adversely affect the pilot’s ability to safely operate the aircraft. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
³ Johnson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 7:08 am
The latest of Ukraine’s two declarations was registered with the court in 2015 after Ukraine’s Parliament adopted a resolution distinctly accepting the ICC’s jurisdiction indefinitely from Feb. 20, 2014, onward. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:35 am
Even setting aside the questionable legitimacy of the 2016 plebiscite (which was not even clearly going to be binding), my question was instead based on the 2019 general elections that allowed Boris Johnson's Tories to "sweep" into power and thus to guarantee that "leave means leave. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 1:57 pm
Despite weeks of warning, Russia’s Feb. 24 decision to launch an invasion of Ukraine caught much of the world by surprise. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:15 pm
The slogan “Rising to the Challenge” tells potential clients that no case is too big for the firm. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:40 am
” Like the 70+ similar cases preceding it, the case failed. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Is a case wagging its tail or almost certainly a bonanza? [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
” The actuarial board did not adopt a binding definition until 2015 — 13 years after CMS promulgated the regulation. [read post]
