Search for: "Johnson v. Minnesota, State of" Results 241 - 260 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
  But would we have preferred the Minnesota procedure in Coleman v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Johnson J reached the same decision as Heather Williams J ([2023] EWHC 232 (KB) [pdf]). [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Department of Commerce (nikkikalbing@gmail.com) The Future of Law in British Africa on the Eve of IndependenceRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School (oakande@sjd.law.harvard.edu) Marginalizing "Secularism," Decolonizing the State: Missionary Advocacy for Religious Freedom in British Colonial Northern Nigeria, 1945-1960Terence Mashingaidze, Midlands State University, Zimbabwe (mashingaidzet@staff.msu.ac.zw) Constitutionalism and Ritual Controversies in a… [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
  More recently, similar suits have been filed by the States of California, Maine, Maryland and Minnesota; the NAACP; and a half-dozen individuals who are currently protected by DACA. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
Most Iowans including many in this room have no experience with drainage districts because they only operate in some parts of the state. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
Buffalo Law SchoolFriday, March 30, 4:30 pm"Impact of International Law on Multinational Corporations": Lucinda Low, Steptoe & Johnson LLP (moderator)Friday, March 30, 8 pmAnnual Dinner Introduction by Sarah Cleveland, visiting at Harvard Law SchoolSaturday, March 31, 9 am"UN Sale of Goods Convention: Perspectives on Current State-of-Play": Ingeborg Schwenzer, U. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]