Search for: "Joint Industry Board v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit) (IP:JUR) ‘Damages for infringing invalid patents’: a comment (PatLit) The inescapable trap enlarged: EPO Technical Board of Appeal decision in Unilever v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am by PJ Blount
Stating the reasons why protection is necessary. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:51 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, management attorney and consultant Ms. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Kelly
Google (Patently-O) CAFC requires agency relationship or contractual obligation for joint infringement: Akamai Techs. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
Below is a list of some common terms used in the trucking industry. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
Archmetal Industries Corporation (IPblog) Copyright and innovation from yoga to football: FWS Joint Sports Claimants v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
Just click here to see the bills for a specific state. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
– EPA News Release, September 9, 2010 Edge Tech Industries, a printed circuit boards and contract manufacturer in Davenport, Iowa, has agreed to pay a $26,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle claims that it failed to submit necessary annual reports listing the quantities of toxic lead that it manufactured, processed or otherwise used during 2006, 2007 and 2008. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]