Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders" Results 241 - 260 of 738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
In Villareal-Garcia, the Federal Public Defender’s office told me it has a policy that it “does not make available to the public documents that are not available through an electronic service. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:51 pm by David Kris
S. 438, 464 (1928), which held that telephone wiretapping was not a Fourth Amendment “search” because there “was no entry of the houses or offices of the defendants,” to Katz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
West Virginia exempts from state taxation the retirement benefits of former state law-enforcement officers but does not provide the same exemption for the retirement benefits of former employees of the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
 The defendant’s appeal was dismissed. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On 22 May 2018 Nicklin J heard a preliminary issue on meaning in the case of Gideon Falter v Gilad Atzmon concerning an article on the defendant’s website entitled “Antisemitism is merely a business plan”. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer, Ashley Deeks
… Are there concerns that an individual's mental state might exacerbate risk? [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts  On 1 May 2018, Warby J gave judgment on the committal application in the case of Pirtek (UK) Ltd v Jackson [2018] EWHC 1004 (QB) finding that the defendant was in contempt of court. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  Where the offender is a public office holder, the appropriate audience is the public. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  In contrast, Master McCloud in Paxton Jones v Chichester Harbour Conservancy [2017] EWHC 2270 found that the deeming provisions operate as a means of calculating other deadlines, such as the acknowledgement of service and defence. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Harleen Gambhir
Department of State, and Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
But French law does provide for the Louvre's actions: last December last, France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d’État, confirmed that a public entity can forbid a private entity to take pictures of works inside a public museum. [read post]