Search for: "Jones v. State.2"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Department of the Interior (Water Rights; Trust Relationship) Jones v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:03 am
App. 3 Cir 11/8/17), 230 So. 3d 997, writ denied, 17-2501 (La. 2/2/18), 233 So.3d 615, cert denied, ___ U.S. , 139 S.Ct. 104, 202 L. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Morland-Jones v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Merry Shipping had been effectively overruled. [2] D. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:37 am
Jones, 475 F.3d 292, 311–12 (6th Cir.2007); see also French v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
2. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
” Id. at 3 n. 2. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:26 am
Zmodo Technology Corporation Limited, 2-17-cv-02714 (NVD February 14, 2018, Order) (Jones, USDJ) [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 5:37 pm
The latest issue of the World Trade Review (Vol. 23, no. 2, May 2024) is out. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Pigott and Jones concur. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:39 am
” McCreary Cty. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 2:24 pm
” McCreary Cty. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:53 pm
2) [GC] (nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, paras 104-07), Axel Springer AG ([GC], no. 39954/08, paras 85-88), Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:01 pm
Jones at some point in the future. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
[1]521 US 844 (1997) https://www.oyez.org/cases/1996/96-511 [2]Packingham v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
A Summary of the Jones v. [read post]
