Search for: "Jones v. York" Results 241 - 260 of 1,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Its four sessions will address the following topics:Chase, The Antislavery Lawyer, covering his constitutional challenges to the  Fugitive Slave Act in the In re Matilda and Jones v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
Rugaber has this report at Forbes.com; Ashby Jones has this post at the WSJ.com Law Blog; and Dennis Crouch reports here at Patently-O. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:14 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Consistent with the New York court, the Louisiana Court of Appeals held, in Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 1:28 pm
The New York Times reports that the plaintiff has appealed Judge Batts's no-fair-use decision. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Admiralty Special Verdict Awards in Jones Act Case Stand; Collateral Source Rule Applies to Half-Pay Sick Leave Dumitrescu v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKDamages Collateral Source Rule Bars Evidence of Injured's Prior Disability Benefits in Action for Jones Act Damages King v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 46576 (WD NY, March 28, 2013), a New York federal district court dismissed, with leave to amend, a complaint by a Jewish inmate that, as a pre-trial detainee, his kosher meals were mutilated, smashed, shaken and contaminated with pubic hair on a daily basis.In Jones v. [read post]